I7 6 core processors

I7 6 core processors DEFAULT

Best Intel processor: Core i3, i5, i7 and i9 explained

What’s the best Intel processor?

If you&#;ve already sided with Team Blue in the Intel vs AMD debate, then we&#;ve provided a rundown of all the best Intel processor options here, as well as multiple explanations if you&#;re not well rehearsed in CPU lingo.

The first thing you need to know is that Intel is now in its 11th Generation for both laptops and desktop chips. 11th Gen laptop CPUs (aka Tiger Lake) have been around for some time now, and are great for someone who wants a slim and light laptop that can do some light gaming.

11th Gen desktop processors (aka Rocket Lake) are much newer, and a mixed bag. The higher-end chipsets disappoint, struggling to compete with AMD Ryzen rivals, and even Intel’s last generation 10th Gen CPUs. 

But what are the best Intel processor options you should buy. Let’s start with a few recommendations for different scenarios. 

A snapshot of recommendations

Best Intel processor for budget gaming desktops: Intel Core iF

Consider the Intel Core iF if you want a processor for a gaming PC and have a tight budget. It doesn’t have its own GPU, so needs to be paired with a graphics card. But this saves you a little cash over the standard i 

We haven&#;t reviewed this processor, but the specs suggest that it probably offers the biggest proportional generation jump in performance of the 11th Gen desktop series, and is not a bad pairing even for very high-end cards like the Nvidia RTX with most games. That’s right, a £ CPU can be paired with a GPU that costs ££, depending on timing and luck when you try to buy a graphics card.

Hardcore PC gamers would disagree, not least because the Intel Core iF is not an unlocked processor, meaning it cannot be overclocked properly. But it’s a good buy for many. 

Best all-rounder performance CPU:
Intel Core iK

The Intel Core iK is the Intel CPU I am most likely to recommend to enthusiast system builders who do not have a limitless budget. It’s powerful enough to act as, at most, a mild bottleneck when paired with the most powerful graphics cards. 

Performance per pound is sound, and this is a “K” series card, giving you the option to overclock substantially if you have the cooling to match. And it has baked in UHD graphics. You can use it without a graphics card, handy if you’re waiting for prices to cool down a bit before buying. 

Intel’s most powerful mainstream desktop CPU:
Intel Core iK

Our Computing Editor, Ryan Jones, is not a huge fan of the Intel Core iK, with good reason. It’s expensive and doesn’t match its AMD rivals for multi-threaded performance. 

However, its single-core performance is excellent and you need one of these 11th Gen Intel or Ryzen chips to get PCIe support. This is required to max-out the speed of the latest SSDs.

Some of the performance fiends out there should still consider the older Intel Core iK, though. It’s significantly cheaper and actually outperforms the newer processor in quite a few situations because it has 10 cores, to the Intel Core iK’s eight. 

Best laptop CPU to look out for:
Intel Core iG7

I’ve picked the laptop Core i5 as the laptop CPU of choice, but your options are likely to determined in part by the model you choose. Not all laptops come in all varieties of processor. 

However, the iG7,ig7, ig7 and ig7 mobile processors are the 11th Gen laptop highlights as they have Intel Xe graphics.

These chipsets are better than the integrated GPUs of their respective desktop cousins, and let you play games once thought of as ultra-demanding on a thin and light laptop. I&#;m talking about titles like Kingdom Come: Deliverance and The Witcher 3, not genuine oldies like Skyrim. 

Intel Rocket Lake

Choosing between an Intel Core i3, i5, i7 and i9

An Intel Core i5 is a sensible place to start whether you plan to buy a laptop or desktop. You can’t really go wrong with an i5, particularly with the 11th generation chipsets. They have enough power for high-end gaming, intensive image editing work and video editing. And they use less power than a Core i7 or i9, which is nice.

The Core i7 is more powerful than the Core i5 series. And the Core i9 chipsets are, you guessed it, more powerful than the i7s.

Intel’s Core i3 CPUs are usually the least-discussed these days, but they still exist and are a great choice for low-cost family PCs and ultra-budget gaming desktops. However, at the time of writing you’d have to buy a 10th Gen i as an 11th Gen Core i3 is not available (yet). 

So how do you quantify the differences between an Intel Core i3 and an i9? I&#;m going to stay away from benchmark results and too much deep tech talk, and stick to two factors: cores and clock speed.

I can use a human analogy here. If you have more cores, you have more workers to do a job. And a higher clock speed means each of these workers can get stuff done at a quicker pace.

Some tasks, like gaming, benefit more from a few fast cores than an increased number of them. But others like video editing love a processor with lots of cores, because the applications are designed to exploit all the available CPU power. Games are, for the most part, miners of graphics card power. 

Here’s a run down of the core counts, base clock speeds and turbo clock speeds of the desktop 11th Gen CPUs, for reference. 

Intel Core i 6 coresGHzGHz Turbo
Intel Core iK6 coresGHzGHz Turbo
Intel Core i8 coresGHzGHz Turbo
Intel Core iK8 coresGHz5GHz Turbo
Intel Core iK8 coresGHzGHz Turbo
Intel Core i (10th Gen)4 coresGHzGHz Turbo

In previous years we would have had to explain another term to get to the root of performance differences, hyperthreading. But all the main 11th Gen have hyperthreading.

This is where you (to torture the metaphor a little more) get to give each of the workers two jobs at at time instead of one. Those folks should unionise.

Looking a little deeper into the upgrades

Higher-end Intel processors also have more cache memory than mid-range and low-end ones. This is very fast storage used to hold the data the CPU cores are about to need. The Intel Core i has 6MB, the Intel Core iK 12MB. 

Top-spec CPUs like the Intel Core iK and Intel Core iK have 16MB. However, the last gen iK has 20MB. Intel can justify this as the newer version has fewer cores, but it’s another reason why some techies look down on the 11th Gen Core i9.

Intel Rocket Lake

How to choose an Intel CPU: What the names mean

Choosing whether to buy a Core i5, i7 or i9 can seem pretty simple. It’s one of those “good, better, best” scenarios. But you also need to pay attention to the letters at the end of a CPU name before you head to the checkout. 

Here’s what they mean. 

Desktop letters

K &#; This means the CPU is unlocked, which is essential if you plan on overclocking. This is where you manually increase the speed of a processors cored beyond their defaults, for better performance at the cost of more heat. Gamers who pay attention to the cooling in their desktops will always want an unlocked CPU.

F &#; Processors with an &#;F&#;at the end do not have an integrated graphics section. This means they absolutely need some form of standalone graphics card, or they won’t even be able to display Windows. Those building a gaming PC should consider one of these, as it saves you a small amount of cash, which can be spent elsewhere. 

T &#; Most of you probably don’t want a &#;T&#;CPU. These use lower clock speeds in order to consume less power. Why would you want one? They also create less heat, so are a good fit for cramped mini PCs. 

Laptop letters

G &#; This means the CPU has its own half-decent graphics section built into the CPU. However, Intel now puts &#;G&#;in stacks its Core i series laptop, making it next to meaningless without also looking at the number that follows. “G4” means a laptop has an Intel UHD graphics chip, which is pretty poor. “G7” means it has Intel Xe graphics, which are kinda great. They let you play some surprisingly demanding games

H &#; &#;H&#;stands for high performance. These processors get you closer to desktop PC power, but also use a lot more of battery and create more heat under strain. They are used in thicker, heavier laptops that can accommodate better cooling systems. But you probably wouldn’t want to carry most of them around every day. 

U &#; You don’t see the &#;U&#;in Intel’s 11th Gen laptop CPU names. But it’s an important one to know because it was everywhere beforehand, and older processors will float around for a while. It stands for Ultra Low Voltage — battery-saving, in other words. Intel’s “G” laptop CPUs are in the same mould, made largely for thin and light laptops.

Intel Rocket Lake

Should you go below the Core i series?

There are two rungs below the Intel Core i3 series: Pentium and Celeron. 

Intel Pentium CPUs come in Gold and Silver versions. Pentium Golds are desktop CPUs, and are not a bad fit for a computer that will just be used for Office apps, video streaming and browsing. Or as part of a budget gaming PC with a low-end or lower-mid-range graphics card.

However, they only have two cores and are not close to the recommended Core i and Core i in performance. The G is the latest Pentium Gold processor. Pentium Silver chipsets, like the N, are laptop processors and are only well suited to the basics. If the jump to an 11th Gen Intel Core i3 does not cost too much, make that jump.

Celerons are the weakest Intel processors, and are not recommended in general. Laptops with these processors are usually noticeably slow. You are better off spending a little more on at least a Pentium Gold in a desktop build.

Should you wait for the 12th Gen Intel series?

Intel’s next generation of CPUs will offer more dramatic changes than the 11th Gen. The 12th generation of desktop CPUs is known as Alder Lake, and will use sets of ‘power’ cores and efficiency cores. This arrangement is similar the Apple M1 CPU used in the latest MacBook Air. It’s quite a dramatic change. 

Where today’s Core i9 CPU has eight cores, the next will likely have eight &#;big&#;cores and eight &#;little&#;cores. The hope is for a high-end processor that can beat the standard-setting AMD Ryzen 9 x/X, and make up some of the ground Intel has lost to Apple in the laptop space. 

Intel’s next generation of CPUs will be far more interesting than the 11th. But you’ll also need a new motherboard as they will connect using a different socket. Stick to Trusted Reviews for all of the latest news on Intel&#;s upcoming processors. 

Sours: https://www.trustedreviews.com/best/best-intel-processor

Until a few years ago, most of the CPUs on the market were single-core, but that isn’t so anymore. Now, builders and gamers are considering 6 core vs 8 core processors more.

To begin with, processors have multiple cores to carry heavier clock speeds and allow for multiple apps to be open at the same time (think gaming and streaming, for example).

Multi-core processors are popular as the load became too much for a single processor and processors themselves couldn’t be updated due to size and tech limits. Manufacturers have shifted to replicating the processing units and creating multiple cores to help programs run faster.

While there are much larger cores available, most people choose between a 6 core processor and an 8 core processor for gaming, heavy workloads, and more because they are the most readily available.

As they serve almost the same purpose, are there significant differences between 8 core and 6 core processors? Read on to find out.

6 Cores vs 8 Cores: The Battle

Both 6 cores and 8 cores processors are made for gaming and heavy workload processes. Our experts have listed their similarities and differences below.

&#; 6 Cores CPU

Six-core CPUs (also known as hexa-core processors) are the choice processors for most work environments because they have that perfect balance between price and performance. They are sufficient in most buildings unless someone is going to be editing photos or videos or working with architecture software, for example.

They can be used for full-stack web development. They can even be used for CPU-intensive games, though as heavier games come out, there will be some limitations.

Six-core CPUs are available fairly readily on almost all platforms and are used widely by competitive gamers. Users who need multithreading should aim to use a 6 core CPU, but you don’t have to use it to get all of the benefits. You just need to ensure that your processor can handle what you want to do.

Most games won’t depend as much on multithreading anymore, so that isn’t something you need to fixate on as you build your rig.

&#; 8 Core Computer

Eight-core CPUs (also known as octa-core processors) are the chosen processors for gamers, developers, designers, and other work environments that require powerful machines. They are some of the more expensive models, but they make work a lot easier for people who have to process a lot at the same time, like architects, editors, and graphic designers. They can be used by anyone, but most work environments will think they’re overkill.

Eight-core computers are available for purchase already put together and ready to go, or you can buy them individually to build your own rig. You just need to make sure that the rest of the parts in the computer can match and live up to the speed and bandwidth. This makes building a computer a bit harder with 8 cores, but certainly not impossible.

Moving into the future, most computers will have 8 cores standard and those who need more will have higher versions.

What Is the Difference Between 8 Core and 6 Core?

The number of cores indicates just how many tasks a CPU can do at the same time. This doesn’t necessarily mean that an 8 core CPU can handle eight tasks, but rather that you can do multiple things at the same time. The more cores you have, the smoother the performance of your computer is going to be.

When comparing 6 cores and 8 cores, you should also consider the long-term use. Games are only getting more complex these days and soon enough they will need more cores to give you the high performance that you need. You also need to think about your GPU as well as the CPU.

Are Your Cores Physical or Logical?

Another thing you need to pay attention to is whether you have physical cores or logical cores on your CPU. Logical cores are also called threads. Intel and AMD, in particular, use threads and logical cores to help split up the power of a physical core so that it functions as two or more logical cores.

Almost all new CPUs will feature a combination of physical cores and logical cores to help keep everything small. Even budget CPUs will have logical cores.

You really need to look at the overall picture to determine whether or not you are going to have enough cores for your build.

You would want to check:

  • How the GPU and the CPU interact
  • Whether you will be playing games or not
  • If you are, how are the games coded?
  • Whether you will be streaming

With logical or physical cores, there really isn’t a large difference in performance. There may be a smaller gap in some games, but that’s rare and only in games that have a ton of action and graphics.

6 Core vs 8 Core for Gaming: Which One Is More Suitable?

When computers were first built, there was only one core and this led to issues with gaming. As gaming became more popular and technology got better, there were computers with 4 cores, 6 cores, and 8 cores. A higher core count means that a rig can do more.

Before or so, having a CPU with a higher core didn’t mean much because games weren’t developed to take advantage of multiple CPUs. Now that has changed and there is a pretty significant difference between having 6 cores and having 8 cores. As this change has largely impacted games, developers started to make games that take advantage of higher core counts as well.

Single-core performance is important for gaming because you need to break down the individual cores and see how they function. However, in general, the more cores you have, the better off you will be.

If you are a serious gamer who is on a budget, then using 6 cores is going to be plenty. In most situations, you won’t use all of the cores anyway. For gamers that stream, however, an 8 core CPU can significantly improve the end results of your build.

Each game will interact differently with the cores. Not all games are going to benefit from having more cores. However, no games will encounter any issues because of too much core space (though some games will have issues if there is too little). If you really want to future-proof your rig, splurge and get more cores.

Currently, we have no way of knowing whether or not 6 cores will be enough into the future, but trends say probably not.

Core Bottlenecking Will Be an Issue With Both

The purpose of having more cores is to avoid bottlenecks. Unfortunately, there are always going to be issues with a bottleneck with certain activities. If your GPU isn’t working at maximum capacity because your CPU doesn’t have enough cores or is too slow, you are going to have a bottleneck. This can apply when you pair older parts with newer parts or a CPU and GPU that aren’t congruent.

If your GPU isn’t working at the same speed as your CPU, you are going to have a bottleneck there. If your GPU is faster than your CPU, and you don’t have enough cores, your CPU will cause the bottleneck. Unless your CPU and GPU match, you won’t have any extra performance support and you will have spent way too much money on one aspect of your rig.

Unfortunately, there are some other unpredictable bottlenecks that exist. It is a battle that you will have to fight at every turn.

Conclusion: Which Processor Do We Recommend?

It is important to note that the core count of a processor depends on how many tasks it can process in parallel.

There are other factors that go into performance as well, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you can operate six or eight heavy tasks at the same time.

Instead, it refers to individual tasks and most applications (especially while gaming) request multiple independent tasks. Even with 8 cores, it is possible to overwhelm your CPU. As such, you need to be wary of temperatures and cooling.

Overall, you can never have too many cores, but you can have too few. We’d suggest getting 8 cores instead of 6 cores if you think you are going to need them, like when you are gaming or doing heavy processing tasks. If you will just be using your computer for general tasks like word processing, a 6 core will be enough.

One Computer Guy

The main goal of this site has always been to provide accurate, understandable and easy to find information regarding Internet Technology.

Sours: https://www.onecomputerguy.com/6-core-vscore
  1. Lee county alabama sample ballot
  2. Sportster camshafts
  3. Peterbilt california
  4. Waxahachie funeral home

Just five years ago, debating the merits of a 6-core CPU versus an 8-core model wasn’t possible. We were all stuck with 4-core chips at a consumer level—to break past that barrier, you had to pay serious bucks for a high-end desktop (“big socket”) CPU. Not that you needed to go that extreme for gaming.

Nowadays, game developers have begun adapting to the new normal of high core-count processors. And if you’re going to have a PC for years, you want one that’s going to comfortably see you through the duration.

But choosing between a mid-tier 6-core CPU and a higher-tier 8-core CPU isn’t a simple matter of more cores equaling better performance. It’s actually a nuanced decision, one that you should come to after considering four major factors. Here’s how it shakes out. 

Performance

cyberpunk rtx onNvidia

Core count doesn’t tell the whole story of performance. The games you play and the resolution you play at also influence the real-world outcome.

In games that don’t take advantage of multicore processors, single-core performance will matter more. You’ll see smaller, often negligible differences in framerates between 6-core and 8-core processors from the same generation.

Other games—think blockbuster-level games, especially those with open-world environments—make more use of available cores, sometimes even scaling performance with core count. Benchmark results for lower core-count CPUs can begin to trail their high-tier siblings, and in some games you can see as much as a 10 to 15 percent difference between 6-core and 8-core processors.

However, you can’t assume you should choose the 8-core processor and call it a day if you’re a fan of big open-world games. Game optimization can also affect performance. For one family of CPUs, you might see the 6-core processor outperform the 8-core version in a specific title, and then the exact opposite in the rival family.

You also won’t see as much of a difference the higher you go in resolution. Move up from p, and gaps in performance shrink to virtually zero by p in some games. Reach 4K and the burden is often completely on the graphics card. In the end, you’ll have the clearest picture about the chips you’re comparing after looking at specific test results.

Winner: Check the benchmark results

Longevity

kaby lake back next to haswell e haswell sandy bridge resizedGordon Mah Ung

Some people believe that because game consoles have 8-core processors, PC users should expect eight cores to become the standard for gaming. But while games have begun making greater use of available cores, we don’t believe that will happen soon. And by the time it does, your gaming PC will be ready for an upgrade anyway.

Consoles are built for long lives: The last two generations had runs of about seven years each. The eight cores in the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X and S likely have to last for the same amount of time—which is almost twice as long as a gaming PC’s average lifespan.

A current-gen 6-core processor should perform well for another four to five years, which is when most PC gamers begin to think about an upgrade. On the flip side, if you plan to get serious mileage out of your processor, an 8-core chip hedges your bets. Many people held on to Core iK and Core iK parts for eight years or more before finally upgrading, after all. (Heck, some still write to us saying they haven’t given up on those beloved Sandy Bridge CPUs yet.)

Winner: Stalemate

Price

Core i listing on B&H.comPCWorld

The less you spend on a component, the more cash you have for games. And that can be better for gaming in its own way. For some folks, a steady diet of games is as important as framerates—or more so.

In a surprise to no one, a 6-core part costs less money. As a mid-tier consumer processor, such CPUs run between $ to $ Moving up to an 8-core processor will set you back between $ to $ This characterization oversimplifies the current market, but you can still safely trust that 6-core chips will cost less than their 8-core counterparts of the same era. Usually you’ll save between $ to $, or almost three blockbuster games at full price. (Double that if you catch good sales.)

That’s an immediate win on price. Another potential one is if 6-core processors remain the baseline in the distant future. If you upgrade at the same point you would have with an 8-core processor, you didn’t spend extra on your CPU needlessly. But if you later find out that you have to upgrade sooner than expected? You still got to enjoy more games. You’re also going to see a boost in performance after the hardware update. And depending on technology advances, you may spend less than you’d assume—so not money wasted at all.

Winner: 6-core processors

Upgradability

am4socketMSI

This factor comes into play when deciding between an AMD processor and its Intel rival. For the longest time, AMD has kept the same motherboard socket across generations of Ryzen CPUs. That allows owners of earlier Ryzen chips to keep their existing motherboards, making processor upgrades very easy and much cheaper. In contrast, Intel changes its socket specifications much more often (usually within two generations), all but guaranteeing a CPU and motherboard upgrade.

But when pitting two chips from the current AMD and Intel generations, this point doesn’t matter. AMD is moving on to the AM5 socket with its Zen 4 processors, negating this upgradability perk for its existing Zen 3 (Ryzen series) processors. If you buy a Ryzen processor today, upgrades to a future Zen chip will require a new CPU and motherboard, just like Intel.

However, if you’re on a budget and comparing an older generation of processors, you may find that an AMD 6-core part provides more value than an 8-core Intel part from the same era. Shop the used market later for a newer socket AM4-compatible AMD CPU down the road (perhaps even an 8-core one), and you’ll improve your PC’s performance while continuing to keep your costs low.

Winner: Specific to your situation

Conclusion

Unlike other head-to-head showdowns, this face-off results in few specific winners for our categories. The problem with arguing about CPU core counts and how they affect PC gaming is that the processors don’t live in a vacuum.

Not only does a processor’s microarchitecture affect performance and upgradability, but a gamer’s budget influences what prices are feasible and how long a CPU will stay in their computer. (And let’s be real here: If you’re debating between a 6-core and an 8-core processor, your budget matters to you.)

In the end, you should research specific 6-core and 8-core chips to see what kind of performance you get, then balance that against your budget and plans for the future. But if you’re too busy and must have a champion, then here’s the judges’ ruling: Buy the 6-core for gaming. You can buy the 8-core if you want, but not for gaming—you should have other things you plan to do with it that make use of those extra cores. Then go build your PC, load the next game in your queue, and have fun.

If you need even more guidance after reading all this, be sure to check out our roundup of the best CPUs for gaming.

Winner: 6-core processor

Sours: https://www.pcworld.com/article//6-core-vscore-cpus-whats-better-for-gaming.html
The $50 6 Core Alternative to an i7

Intel Core i7

Intel Core i7

Actual generation:
Actual architecture: Alder Lake S
Technology: 10 nm

The Intel Core i7 series includes Intel's most powerful desktop and mobile processors for private use. In Intel released new Intel Core i9 processors for enthusiasts wich have more CPU cores than Intels Core i7 processors. All Intel Core i7 processors have hyperthreading technology that doubles the displayed CPU core number, while the performance increases by up to 40% compared to processors without hyperthreading.

All desktop processors have at least 4 cores, mobile and ultra-mobile versions have 2 to 4 cores. The mobile versions with 2 cores can be recognized by the endings Mand U, the variants with 4 cores are marked with MQor HQ.

Desktop versions that are marked with a K, have an unlocked multiplier and can be overclocked. The processors of the Core i7 series are very fast and suitable for very complex office tasks, video editing, image editing, or the latest video games.

All Intel Core i7 CPUs




back to index
Facebook
Twitter

Sours: https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu_family-intel_core_i

6 processors i7 core

8th Gen Intel Core i5 vs. i7: Which CPU is right for you?

You're at your local supercenter and you have two laptops in front of you: one with an Intel Core i7, and one with an Intel Core i5.

Comparing laptop CPUs can be complicated, so which do you choose? Do you go for the one with the supposed increase in power that their tech expert claims it has? Or do you save a few bucks and get the cheaper one?

Worry not, we're here to answer all of your questions. And to do that, we called in two seemingly identical Dell XPS 13 laptops (p display, 8GB RAM, GB SSD). The difference being that one is outfitted with an Intel Core iU, and the other has a Core iU. Let's see how they stack up.

Intel Core i5 vs. Core i7: Benchmark Results

Core i5Core i7Ultraportable Notebooks Average
Geekbench 413,13,12,
HandBrake
Excel
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited78,83,78,
Battery Life

Clock Speed and Price

While the Intel Core iU and Core iU are both quad-core processors with the ability to process eight threads simultaneously, their clock speeds are slightly different. The Core i5's clock speed is set at GHz (GHz with Max Turbo), while the Core i7's is faster at GHz (GHz with Max Turbo). The Core i7 also has a bigger processor cache at 8MB, compared with the Core i5's 6MB. Intel's SmartCache determines how much space there is in the processor to remember particular functions and to carry them out faster than usual.

The numbers seem pretty minuscule, but how much are those numbers going to cost you? Well, the two XPS 13s that we tested currently cost $1, (Core i5) and $1, (Core i7), creating a $ price gap. The $ delta continued when I configured the Acer Aspire 5, but when configuring the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, I saw only a $ difference.

Overall Performance

To test a laptop's overall performance, we use a synthetic benchmark called Geekbench 4. The XPS 13's Core i5 CPU scored 13,, narrowly beating the 12, ultraportable notebook average. However, the Core i7 didn't make a significant difference with its score of 13,, which is a percent increase from the Core i5.

Video Transcoding

On the HandBrake benchmark, which tests how long it takes a machine to transcode a GB, minute-andsecond 4K video to p, the XPS 13's Core i5 CPU took 18 minutes and 28 seconds, which slides past the category average. The Core i7, however, did it in 17 minutes and 19 seconds, putting a ( percent) gap between them.

Excel Test

To pile on the stress to the CPUs, we put them up against use our Excel test, which requires them to match 65, names and addresses. The Core i5 CPU knocked it out in 1 minute and 12 seconds, 16 seconds faster than the category average. The Core i7 did it a only few seconds faster, at , for a mere percent difference.

3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited

Although you're not going to be taking on Witcher 3 with the Intel UHD GPU inside these two XPS 13s, there are plenty of AAA titles that these two can handle. But which does it better?

On the 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited benchmark, which tests the overall graphics performance, the Core i5's GPU hit 78,, falling just short of the 78, ultraportable notebook average. Meanwhile, the Core i7 nailed an 83,, effectively making it percent better than the Core i5, which is the same exact increase as the general performance.

Battery Life

With great power comes great power consumption, so we decided to test that by having each laptop continuously surf the web over Wi-Fi at nits of brightness. The Core i5 lasted 10 hours and 51 minutes, sailing past the ultraportable notebook average. However, the Core i7 stood its ground and survived for 10 hours and 49 minutes, making an unnoticeable percent difference to the Core i5.

Which Intel CPU should you get?

Although the Core iU beat the Core iU fair and square, it really wasn't by much. At most, the Core i7 is only 6 percent faster in overall performance, which is quite underwhelming when you consider the price difference. A single minute spared during video editing certainly isn't worth $ to $

If you work in a field that requires you to run taxing programs all day, it may be of use to you. However, the money would be better spent on upgraded storage space, a higher-resolution display, or even a discrete GPU for gaming.

Rami Tabari is a Senior Writer for Laptop Mag. He reviews every shape and form of a laptop as well as all sorts of cool tech. You can find him sitting at his desk surrounded by a hoarder's dream of laptops, and when he navigates his way out to civilization, you can catch him watching really bad anime or playing some kind of painfully difficult game. He’s the best at every game and he just doesn’t lose. That’s why you’ll occasionally catch his byline attached to the latest Souls-like challenge.

Sours: https://www.laptopmag.com/articles/core-i5-vs-i
Intel's First 6-Core Gaming King: Core i7-8700K, 2020 Revisit

List of Intel Core i7 processors

Model
number sSpec
number Frequency TurboGPU
frequency Cores L2
cacheL3
cacheI/O bus Mult.MemoryVoltageTDPSocketRelease date Part
number(s) Release
price (USD) Standard powerCore iM
  • SLBPD&#;(C2)
  • SLBTQ&#;(K0)
  • SLBPE&#;(C2)
  • SLBTR&#;(K0)
  • SLBZT&#;(K0)
GHz 3/5[Note 1]– MHz 2 2 × KB4 MBDMI20× 2 × DDR –&#;V 35 W January
  • CPAH
  • CNAH
  • CNAA
$ Core iM
  • SLBTN&#;(K0)
  • SLBTP&#;(K0)
  • SLBZU&#;(K0)
GHz 3/5 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 21× 2 × DDR –&#;V 35 W September
  • CPAE
  • CNAE
  • CNAA
$ Standard power, embeddedCore iE
  • SLBRZ&#;(C2)
  • SLBXX&#;(K0)
GHz 3/5 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 19× 2 × DDR –&#;V 35 W BGA January $ Low powerCore iLM
  • SLBML&#;(C2)
  • SLBSU&#;(K0)
2 GHz 4/6 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 15× 2 × DDR –&#;V

25&#;W

BGA January $ Core iLM
  • SLBMK&#;(C2)
  • SLBSV&#;(K0)
GHz 4/6 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 16× 2 × DDR –&#;V

25&#;W

BGA January $ Core iLM GHz 4/6 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 17× 2 × DDR –&#;V

25&#;W

BGA September $ Low power, embeddedCore iLE
  • SLBP9&#;(C2)
  • SLBXH&#;(K0)
2 GHz 4/6 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 15× 2 × DDR –&#;V

25&#;W

BGA January $ Ultra-low powerCore iUM
  • SLBMN&#;(C2)
  • SLBSX&#;(K0)
GHz 5/8 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 8× 2 × DDR –&#;V

18&#;W

BGA January $ Core iUM
  • SLBMM&#;(C2)
  • SLBSR&#;(K0)
GHz 5/8 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 9× 2 × DDR –&#;V

18&#;W

BGA January $ Core iUM GHz 5/8 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 10× 2 × DDR –&#;V

18&#;W

BGA May $ Core iUM GHz 5/8 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 11× 2 × DDR –&#;V

18&#;W

BGA September $ Ultra-low power, embeddedCore iUE
  • SLBPA&#;(C2)
  • SLBXJ&#;(K0)
GHz 5/8 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 8× 2 × DDR –&#;V

18&#;W

BGA January $ Core iUE GHz 5/8 – MHz 2 2 × KB 4 MB DMI 10× 2 × DDR –&#;V

18&#;W

August $
Sours: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_i7_processors

You will also be interested:

Members[edit]

iQM4835 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

2 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

iQM4835 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 35,

February 2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

1 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 32,

February 2425 W

25, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

3 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

January 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

2 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

January 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

2 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 35,

4 September 2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 35,

February 2425 W

25, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM4835 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM2435 W

35, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

January 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

3 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

3 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 58,

January 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 58,

4 September 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 29,

February 2417 W

17, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

 MHz

 GHz
, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 29,

June 2417 W

17, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 32,

February 2417 W

17, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

1 GHz
1,, KHz

iM$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 32,

June 2417 W

17, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iUE$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 32,

February 2417 W

17, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

1, MHz
1,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

 MHz

 GHz
, KHz

iLE$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 35,

February 2425 W

25, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQE$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

January 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

3 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

iQE$ 

€ 
£ 
¥ 39,

January 4845 W

45, mW
 hp
 kW

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

3 GHz

3, MHz
3,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

 GHz

2, MHz
2,, kHz

HD Graphics  MHz

 GHz
, KHz

1, MHz

 GHz
1,, KHz

Sours: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/core_i7


3650 3651 3652 3653 3654